W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-regions] definitions of 'break-*'

From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:47:37 -0800
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4CB19716-F7A6-441C-8BC4-04C077C9B48A@adobe.com>

On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:11 AM, fantasai wrote:

> On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, Vincent Hardy wrote:
>> Hi Fantasai,
>> Since the descriptions are wrong in the specs that do not account for
>> box-decoration-break, we cannot reference CSS 2.1 or multi-column. So for
>> normative reference, it seems it the best option is to reference
>> css3-break. It seems we should also have multi-column reference css3-break.
>> Is that right?
> You should, as I said, state that breaking across regions is treated the
> same as breaking across pages and reference CSS2.1 and CSS3 Break (once
> it's published). The referencing is the less important part. You could
> even leave the references out, but you must put the sentence equating
> breaking across regions and pages in.
> ~fantasai

Hi Fantasai,

I had modified the editor draft according to this feedback:


Please let me know if you find issues with this wording. 

Kind regards,
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 08:48:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC