- From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:47:37 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:11 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, Vincent Hardy wrote: >> Hi Fantasai, >> >> Since the descriptions are wrong in the specs that do not account for >> box-decoration-break, we cannot reference CSS 2.1 or multi-column. So for >> normative reference, it seems it the best option is to reference >> css3-break. It seems we should also have multi-column reference css3-break. >> >> Is that right? > > You should, as I said, state that breaking across regions is treated the > same as breaking across pages and reference CSS2.1 and CSS3 Break (once > it's published). The referencing is the less important part. You could > even leave the references out, but you must put the sentence equating > breaking across regions and pages in. > > ~fantasai Hi Fantasai, I had modified the editor draft according to this feedback: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-regions/#region-flow-break Please let me know if you find issues with this wording. Kind regards, -v
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 08:48:07 UTC