- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:35:54 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com> wrote: > The intention is that dppx should be usable everywhere > <resolution> is used. The media query level 3 spec does not > reflect that simply because it was frozen before dppx was > devised, and we don't want to move the bar of what it means > to be a conforming implementation of media queries. Tangentially related: specs that aren't defining the core grammar shouldn't do lexical scanners anyway. We know that the Appendix G grammar is broken, in that it doesn't even parse all valid *2.1* content, so we shouldn't even pretend that people actually use it. In practice implementations use some approximation of the Chapter 4 grammar, plus a parser that consumes the tokens. In other words, MQ should just say that it accepts a <resolution> there, and be done. As part of my revival of Syntax, I'll attempt to add grammar tokens that should make the definitions of at-rules resemble the definitions of property values. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 00:36:43 UTC