- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:42:03 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > ± Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:02 AM > ± > ± > Perhaps you refer to baselines? Column-direction flexbox always treats > ± 'baseline' alignment as 'center', while its children can have baselines in block > ± direction. We should fix that. > ± > > ± > ± I believe fantasai and I have fixed all of the places where this occurred. It > ± was mostly just in the "hypothetical main size of items" > ± step, because that ends up invoking some subtle behavior with a lot of possible > ± combinations. > > Great! > > We should still fix baseline in column direction, don't you think? I don't see the problem in current spec - the only check done is to ensure that the items' baselines are parallel to the main axis. So, a horizontal writing mode flexbox set to column, but filled with vertical japanese, can baseline-align its items. (And items that fail that check are start-aligned, not center-aligned.) ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 22:42:52 UTC