- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:51:39 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2012-04-20 17:03 -0700, fantasai wrote: > It would also simplify the grammar for 'border-image', could be used > to make <bg-position> optional when <bg-size> is specified in 'background', > and would have removed the first clause in the <position> syntax. While it does seem similar to what 'border-image' does (in that the "ugly" grammar is similar), 'border-image' also has the '/' separators involved (at least, I'm assuming that's the part of 'border-image' you're talking about), so I'm not quite sure how I see how a "one or more of these in any order" would simplify border-image, thanks to the idea that the separators can only be there when they have things to separate. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 18:20:47 UTC