- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:30:56 +0800
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/04/24 14:02), John Daggett wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> Right now, 2.1 says the following about using 'inherit' in a font name: >> >> # The keywords 'initial' and 'default' are reserved for >> # future use and must also be quoted when used as >> # font names. >> >> This isn't strict enough, and implementations do somewhat different >> things around this. See Kenny's email at >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0080.html> >> where he shows several differences in implementations, where some UAs >> accept 'inherit' as part of a font-name, or even as an entire >> font-name in some circumstances. >> >> We propose tightening this up, since there's no use-case for using >> unquoted 'inherit' in a font name, to: I am not in favor of this direction, but no strong opinion whatsoever. > I really don't see why this is important. That's true. > Non-interoperable behavior for edge cases that will never occur in > practice is undesirable but I don't think it warrants much > attention. Well, my interest is to archive my findings on a public list. I see the following ways to handle this situation: A. ignore it at all. B. resolve it and put in a spec. C. don't resolve it, put in a spec and mark it "undefined". D. have a document about "boring known issues" and just put it in. A. is pretty natural. I wouldn't say I like B. too much because it often requires decisions that are more or less arbitrary. Given that C. dilutes the spec and makes the spec unreadable, I think we should think about doing something like D. >>> The keywords 'initial' and 'default' are reserved for >>> future use and must also be quoted when used _in_ >>> font names. > > This is equally imprecise, it implies that only the keywords are > quoted when what you mean to say is that font family names > *containing* these keywords must be quoted. Either that or | unquoted global keywords ('inherit', 'initial' and 'default') are | not allowed inside <family-name>. I mentioned that I don't like this direction so my propose wording is | If the value of 'font-family' is a single global keyword | ('inherit', 'initial' and 'default'), UAs must not interpret it as | <family-name> but the meaning of the global keyword. The implication is that 'font-family: foo, inherit' is still valid. This follows IE9. Cheers, Kenny
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 09:31:25 UTC