- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:04:49 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Hi www-style, I just noticed one circular dependency in the spec that could stand some clarification. So -- the definition for 'flex-align: stretch' [1] says that it makes flexbox items' cross sizes resolve to their line's cross size. Meanwhile, in the Flexbox Layout Alg section about computing a line's cross size, we use its items' cross sizes as inputs. [2] So: when we're computing a line's cross size, what should we be using as the cross sizes for its auto-sized items with flex-align:stretch? I see two possibilities: (a) 0 (since it's not resolved yet) (b) the "normal" auto size (disregarding the effects of "stretch") I'd advocate (b), because otherwise, flexboxes whose children are all auto-sized and have flex-align:stretch (the defaults) would have a cross size of 0 & not render anything, which is pretty bad default behavior. Could we clarify this in the spec? I think the chunk that most needs to address this is [2]. (where it talks about using the items' cross sizes as inputs) ~Daniel [1] Section 8.2, definition of "stretch" http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-align0 [2] Section 9, step 7.3 ("For remaining flexbox items, find the maximum of the cross sizes of their margin boxes.") http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#layout-algorithm
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 00:05:22 UTC