- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:07:45 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/20/2012 05:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > If my precise example bothered you, imagine that you have a vertical > flexbox where only the first is flexible, pushing the rest to the > bottom. > > In this case, still, your suggested behavior would require either > explicitly shutting down flexing on the other boxes, or explicitly > setting them to "height:min-content;", same as the horizontal case. Or setting them to "flex: none", which would actually make sense imo. It does not make sense to you, that the elements in a flexbox be flexible by default, and to assign 'flex: none' to the ones you don't want flexible? ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2012 02:08:17 UTC