- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:51:36 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/17/2012 12:23 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > Le 17/04/12 01:33, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> I have a few pending issues on Flexbox about the naming of various >> properties and property values. I'll lay them out in short form here, >> so we can discuss them all together, like ripping off a band-aid. >> (Note that after this, regardless of the result, I'll be rejecting any >> name-change suggestions with prejudice.) >> >> The Alignment Properties >> ===================== >> In<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0743.html>, >> fantasai proposes renaming all of the alignment properties and some of >> their values: >> >> 'flex-align' becomes 'content-align' >> 'flex-item-align' becomes 'box-align' >> 'flex-line-pack' becomes 'content-pack' >> 'flex-pack' becomes 'content-justify' > > Well, I also see a lot of value in keeping the flex-* prefix. It > adds readability, it helps the learning curve, it helps maintainance > because all flex-box properties are easy to search for with one > pattern only... Please refer to the original email. There's a lot of points of confusion around having so many alignment properties. I really feel it is better for an author to only every have to learn one set. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0743.html ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 01:52:08 UTC