- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:54:17 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 2012/04/18 03:32 (GMT+0800) Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu composed: > It seems that this discussion would benefit greatly from opinions of > those who participated in the previous discussion that led to the > current mapping. I am not one of such people but I think if we add > 'xxx-large', we should probably add 'xxx-small' for consistency. In most environments, 9px is the smallest size legible across entire charsets. In most environments, xx-small maps to 9px. HTML <font> never had anything that would map to xxx-small. Adding xxx-small would do nothing useful. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 19:54:44 UTC