- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:00:12 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 16/04/12 16:48, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> Yes, some lookahead in the parser is required anyway - I'll be trying > > No, not in the parser itself. In the tokenizer... Simon was pointing out that, if I tokenize "|=" as two DELIM tokens rather than a single INCLUDES-MATCH token, I'll need a token of lookahead in the parser to make sure they're parsed correctly in the selector. I was just pointing out that I already need a token of lookahead in the parser for other things, so that's not a problem. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 16:01:06 UTC