On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 16/04/12 16:48, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> Yes, some lookahead in the parser is required anyway - I'll be trying > > No, not in the parser itself. In the tokenizer... Simon was pointing out that, if I tokenize "|=" as two DELIM tokens rather than a single INCLUDES-MATCH token, I'll need a token of lookahead in the parser to make sure they're parsed correctly in the selector. I was just pointing out that I already need a token of lookahead in the parser for other things, so that's not a problem. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 16:01:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:14 UTC