- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:10:18 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 16:10:54 UTC
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2012, at 5:51 PM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think this problem should be solved more generically, rather than > adding keywords to random properties. For example, the `difference` > blending mode could be used on text color to make it more legible > regardless of background. Or, blending modes on borders and/or backgrounds > could produce quite interesting effects. They could also replace the > `invert` keyword on `outline`. > > Maybe a function that can be used in place of any <color> value? > > That was my first thought. Maybe even just extending rgba() and hsla() to > be able to do this sort of thing: rgba(255,255,0,1,m) to multiply, and > rgba(255,255,0,1,s) to screen. Doing it that way forces people to use the 'rgba' notation so they won't be able to do 'color: red screen' Another issue is that this implies that you can use it in gradient color stops which would be very strange. Rik
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 16:10:54 UTC