- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:01:52 -0700
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 23:02:23 UTC
On Apr 10, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > All, > > I'm currently working on the blending specification (http://blogs.adobe.com/webplatform/2012/04/04/bringing-blending-to-the-web/) and someone brought up that a very common use case for blending is drop shadows. > Some of our applications such as Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign set the shadow to multiply by default since it provides a more pleasing appearance that can't be done with simple alpha blending. See http://css-tricks.com/dont-use-black-for-shadows/ for a discussion on why this is. > > Would there be interest in an additional keyword to specify blending to 'box-shadow' or 'text-shadow'? > the syntax could look like: > box-shadow: 64px 64px 12px 40px rgba(0,0,0,0.4) multiply Using a different blend mode just for the shadow would place a burden on implementers who use hardware acceleration of various kinds (i.e. most of us now). Imagine a box-shadow overlapping a playing video. The implementation has to separate the shadow into its own GPU texture, and composite that with a different blending mode from the rest of the element, for every frame of video. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 23:02:23 UTC