- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:27:47 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 04/06/2012 05:10 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> Wouldn't you want to also collapse away any whitespace before and after any untagged non-whitespace content? > > I don't think so, no. > > If the "white-space" propety has its normal value, then it doesn't > matter whether we collapse leading/trailing whitespace -- it's at the > beginning or end of a block (the anonymous flexbox item), and I think > the block will collapse it for us. > > Note that the following two divs will render identically (with > white-space at its default value): > <div>abc</div> > <div> > abc > </div> Huh. How about that. I have a deeply ingrained habit of not doing that with my <p> tags, so that I don't end up with a space at the beginning of a paragraph. I know I used to run into that before (ie6 maybe?), where it collapsed to one space instead of none, but it seems like it isn't a problem any more. > ...which means we don't have to beautify our anonymous flexbox items to > make them look like the first div. > > Now, if we've got "white-space: pre", then I'd say we explicitly do > _not_ want to collapse the leading/trailing white-space, since the > author presumably wanted it there. > > So -- it's safest to just leave leading/trailing whitespace uncollapsed, > IMHO. OK, agreed.
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2012 18:28:18 UTC