- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:20:26 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hi www-style, > > I believe the flexbox spec is currently inconsistent / unclear on handling > of situations with a block inside an inline, like "anonymous item 7.1" in > Example 2. [snip] > I think this needs clarification in the flexbox spec. Maybe we need to > use the element hierarchy instead of the box hierarchy for determining > flexbox item eligibility? I'm not sure if that makes sense. I've tried to fix this by switching entirely to the element hierarchy. When I write the box-tree spec this'll all be clearer. >_< ~TJ
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 17:21:14 UTC