- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:57:00 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/03/2012 01:07 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > That's the kind of deeper evaluation and clarification that I think is warranted. Thank you. > > > Next question: > > When a customer reports an "IE9 bug" because we enforce the about-to-be-removed conformance requirement and thus their page renders differently in IE9 vs. other browsers, where will the rationale below be captured for reference? Is there a place where such valuable information is stored? Or should I rely on the archive for this mailing list as the only official reference. Well, you could point to the spec at the then-current official spec and explain that at IE9's release, the property was restricted, but when the LC errata were folded in the restriction was loosened to allow (but not require) support for box-shadow on ::first-line. In both cases IE9 remains 100% compliant to the spec. BTW, I think "how to" questions on responding to customer support requests is off-topic here. :) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:57:29 UTC