- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:32:15 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@google.com>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 3:11 PM >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Mogilevsky >>> <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> > 2009 spec was specific about effect of visibility:collapse >>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-flexbox-20090723/#displayorder >>> > (removing the items completely, as in tables). All current >>> > implementations do that, so the same text should probably appear in > the new spec. >>> >>> I'm not sure it's clear, actually. Is the collapsed item taken into >>> account when dealing with "flex-pack:justify"? >>> >>> (I have no problem with adding similar text.) >> >> It seems that if "visibility:collapse" is targeting the same kind of dynamic scenarios as in tables, it should behave exactly as "display:none" in flexbox (no extra spacing in justify). It doesn't seem super useful then - but it does make it easier to show/hide items without wiping their 'display' property (your favorite inner/outer display issue). > > Seems fine to me. I'll make the change shortly. I've made the change. (I have an interesting definition of "shortly" sometimes.) ~TJ
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 22:33:03 UTC