- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:27:35 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/30/2011 09:59 AM, François REMY wrote: > This problem can also be solved by using a "var()" function for variables inside property values. > > Just a thought. Yes, I would prefer this. :) It means we can use vendor extensions for experimentation, and it means $ is available for more syntactic substitutions (either via CSS or via another layer, as is currently done). Although I don't mind changing Selectors as well, since I'm not particularly attached to using $. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 18:28:05 UTC