Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

On 09/30/2011 01:15 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> In, :not is described as:
> |E:not(s)|	an E element that does not match simple selector s	Negation pseudo-class
> <> 	3
> |E:not(s1, s2)|	an E element that does not match either compound selector s1 or compound selector s2	Negation pseudo-class
> <> 	4
> Notably, the comma-separated version takes compound selectors and the single-argument version takes a simple selector. I
> believe they should both take compound selectors.

They do: read the normative prose. Would you prefer if I removed the level 3 row
in the table?


Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 18:20:43 UTC