- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:33:45 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/28/2011 11:45 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:18:25 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> - RESOLVED: Future documents need Changes sections before publication. > > The full minutes do not detail what is wrong with the version history of the document. It's primarily useful for the OCD. :) The CVS changelogs are in some ways too detailed--you get all the changes, including minor improvements in wording, rearrangements of sections, changes to white space, typo and syntax error fixes, etc--and in others lack enough detail--the commit messages are not always very descriptive, and in some cases a change might be misclassified under the wrong checkin. (I've seen substantive changes go in under comments like "fix validation error".) The Changes section distils what's changed and where to review the new stuff into something more easily digestible for people who don't have the time, patience, and dedication to follow every single checkin. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 20:34:15 UTC