- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:44:51 +0200
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:
> ± > ± <div style="overflow: hidden; margin: 100px 0;"></div>
> ± > ± <div style="overflow: hidden; margin: 100px 0;"></div>
> ± >
> ± > But this behavior is different for what one would expect for what
> ± > appeared to be your main use case:
> ± >
> ± > <h1 style="column-span:all">Title</h1>
> ± > <h2 style="column-span:all">Subtitle</h2>
> ± > <p style="column-span:all">Abstract...</p>
> ±
> ± I don't understand why it's different; in Opera's implementation, collapsing would occur in
> ± both examples. And float crossing would not occur in any of them.
>
> H1, h2 etc. are normally not BFC
True.
> (their margins collapse with child margin and margins collapse
> trough empty boxes). Then simply adding margin collapsing to
> external margins of colspan doesn't really create compatibility
> with single-column flow.
For the simple use cases above, they would be compatible.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 20:45:45 UTC