On 23/9/11 12:28, Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > 2011-09-23 04:33 EEST: Ojan Vafai: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:30 PM, David Chambers: >>> Since this actually matches an element with @dropzone (and which >>> is a >>> valid dropzone for the dragged element), I think it needs a better >>> name. As an initial bad suggestion, :valid-dropzone. >> How about just :dropzone? > I think that :valid-dropzone would be better. That way there would be a > logical extension :invalid-dropzone that would trigger if user is > dragging something over an area that will not accept the drop. > Isn't that just :not(:valid-dropzone)? Or there's a state where it's neither a valid nor an invalid dropzone? -- Lea Verou (http://leaverou.me | @LeaVerou)Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 10:55:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC