W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: when do transitions occur?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:41:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBudEmfHiSJrdFwi0zo7Xt=PHBseejQ+sS9XLrjBn0dtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:15 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> I think it would be better for the transitions spec to define the
> animation rules for all properties ahead of it (i.e., everything in
> 2.1 or in css3 drafts ahead of it) and we should add "Animatable:"
> lines to the property template for everything behind or roughly even
> with transitions.
> The "Animatable" line should link to *how* the property is
> animatable, so the definitions in the transitions spec should be
> easy to link to, but some modules will give their own definitions as
> well.  (In other words, it should probably say things like "no", "as
> <a>integer</a>", "as <a>shadow</a>", etc.)

Took the words out of my mouth.  I was writing a message to suggest
exactly this before lunch, and now I don't need to send it.

Dean, if you or one of your editors doesn't have time, I'm willing to
make the edit.

Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:42:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC