On 16/09/2011, at 1:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>> The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image >>>> being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for >>>> quite a while. >>> >>> Right; it's just odd that it ever got into such a state. I'm not sure >>> if Image Values was ever in an in-between state where I defined how to >>> transition gradients but not general images. >> >> The Transitions spec itself makes some attempt at defining it (this part has >> not been dropped from the ED). >> >> "gradient: interpolated via the positions and colors of each stop. They must >> have the same type (radial or linear) and same number of stops in order to >> be animated." > > Yeah, that's obviously incomplete and unusable, as it says nothing > about the size/orientation arguments of the gradients. I think I should remove the entire section on animatable properties. We'll be in a flux state until other CSS specs add the animatable description for each of their properties, but I don't think that's so bad. And definitely better than having an erroneous spec. DeanReceived on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:08:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC