Ultimately it shouldn't be the transitions spec that says what properties can transition. Rather, each property definition in all of CSS should indicate whether it can be animated, and how. Dean On 20/09/2011, at 5:00 AM, Simon Fraser wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css- >> >> Are the following properties intentionally omitted (should not transition)? >> border-radius >> box-shadow >> >> border-radius: >> We’ve gotten some internal and external buzz on our JS-animated border-radius Test Drive page since early IE9, so there’s likely interest in such support though I don’t know whether that represents real use case or just “shiny toy effect”. >> >> box-shadow: >> It’s odd to see text-shadow included but not box-shadow. > > No, both of these should be included, as David Baron's note at the bottom of the table indicates. > > Simon > >Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 01:44:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC