- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:22:20 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday 2011-09-20 16:15 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:13 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 2011-09-20 16:03 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> that point into a rectangle (the concrete object size), and the rest > >> of the background canvas is filled with transparent: > > > > Ah, so by "concrete object size" you mean the computed > > background-size? I thought your use of "concrete object size" > > referred to the background painting area. Then again, I shouldn't > > have assumed anything; I should have just asked you to define the > > term. > > I was using the term that I defined in Image Values for the result of > running the sizing algorithm. So if you're going to have long threads discussing proposals, could you please write the proposal down first so that other people can have a minimal chance of following? (I'm pretty close to giving up on trying to follow www-style because of the volume.) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 23:22:46 UTC