On Tuesday 2011-09-20 16:15 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:13 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 2011-09-20 16:03 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> that point into a rectangle (the concrete object size), and the rest > >> of the background canvas is filled with transparent: > > > > Ah, so by "concrete object size" you mean the computed > > background-size? ย I thought your use of "concrete object size" > > referred to the background painting area. ย Then again, I shouldn't > > have assumed anything; I should have just asked you to define the > > term. > > I was using the term that I defined in Image Values for the result of > running the sizing algorithm. So if you're going to have long threads discussing proposals, could you please write the proposal down first so that other people can have a minimal chance of following? (I'm pretty close to giving up on trying to follow www-style because of the volume.) -David -- ๐ L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ ๐ ๐ข Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ ๐Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 23:22:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC