- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:17:20 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
How should we treat an element using flex() in its 'width' or 'height' when it's not a flexbox item? The most obvious answer (to make it a syntax error) isn't available to us, because we don't know whether it's invalid or not until computed value time. I see two reasonable answers: 1. It computes to 'auto'. 2. It computes to the preferred length in the function. I prefer #2. It seems to stay closer to the author's intent - if they wrote "width: flex(1 200px);" for a flexbox item, they're saying the item should start at 200px, and then flex larger if there's free space. If you're in a context that can't flex, there's no free space, so it should just stay at 200px. I'd like to require authors not to use flex() outside of flexbox items, but define the UA handling as #2. Thoughts? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 18:18:08 UTC