- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 02:04:18 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:14 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > The <side-or-corner> production is defined in two different places > in css3-images. In > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#linear-gradients it is defined > as: > # <side-or-corner> = [left | right] || [top | bottom] > whereas in http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#repeating-gradients > it is defined as: > # <side-or-corner> = > # [ [left | right] || [top | bottom] ] | > # [ [start | end] || [before |after] ] > > It seems to me that it should be defined in only one place, and it > should have only one definition. > > (I'm guessing that the addition of start/end/before/after was > intended to apply to both repeating and non-repeating gradients, and > the second definition is the correct one.) Whoops, indeed. No idea how I didn't copy the definition over. You're right that it should be defined in only one place. I'll fix the linear-gradient definition, and then just link to that from repeating-gradient. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 09:05:14 UTC