- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:21:17 -0700
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > What about borrowing the current terminology from HTML5, and calling it: > "content: transparent;" > The transparent keyword would only apply to the element (not the pseudo > element, which is already > covered by inhibit and other flags). What would content:transparent do? In HTML "transparent" is just a term for the semantics of some elements. (We've also discussed a display:transparent that would be thematically similar to HTML's notion of "transparent" - the element wouldn't generate a box in the box tree (similar to display:none), but its children still would.) ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 17:42:53 UTC