On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > What about borrowing the current terminology from HTML5, and calling it: > "content: transparent;" > The transparent keyword would only apply to the element (not the pseudo > element, which is already > covered by inhibit and other flags). What would content:transparent do? In HTML "transparent" is just a term for the semantics of some elements. (We've also discussed a display:transparent that would be thematically similar to HTML's notion of "transparent" - the element wouldn't generate a box in the box tree (similar to display:none), but its children still would.) ~TJReceived on Thursday, 8 September 2011 17:42:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:03 UTC