- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:51:25 -0700
- To: jackalmage@gmail.com
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Hi Tab, Just read through the updated flexbox spec ( http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/ dated 3 September 2011) and I came across a few typos to report: > 2. The Flexbox Box Model [...] > The flexbox layout algorithm works is agnostic as to the physical > direction the flexbox happens to be laid out in s/works is/is/ > 2.1. New values for ‘display’ property [...] > Setting ‘display:flexbox’ on an element forces it to use a new layout > algorithm, and so some properties that were designed with the > assumption of block layout don't make sense in a flexbox context. The first line of this paragraph should probably mention (or be inclusive of) _both_ 'display:flexbox' _and_ 'inline-flexbox'. (Maybe that's implied though (?)) > A flexbox item creates a new flexbox formatting context for its contents. > [...] the flexbox's margins do not collapse with any other margin. I think this is meant to say "the _flexbox items'_ margins do not collapse", right? (I'm making that assumption since the spec is describing conditions for the flexbox's _contents_ here, and also because the flexbox itself is supposed to behave like a block as far as its external container is concerned, which I'd imagine would include margin-collapsing...? Not sure though.) > 5.1. Main Axis Alignment: the ‘flex-pack’ property [...] > The ‘flex-pack’ property aligns flexbox items in the main axis of the > current line of the flexbox. This is done after any flexible lengths [...] Here, the word "after" (in "This is done after") is mistakenly linkified to #flex-align-after, in the spec HTML. > 5.2. Cross Axis Alignment: the ‘flex-align’ property [...] > Value: start | end | center | baseline | stretch [...] > [definitions of values' meaning, including "before", > "after", "middle", "baseline", "stretch"] The labels "before"/"after"/"middle" in the value definitions here don't match the labels in the "Values:" line. Thanks, ~Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 20:51:55 UTC