On 9/1/2011 1:30 AM, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur wrote: > Am 01.09.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Charles Pritchard: > >> On 8/31/2011 2:32 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> Oh, that's not my proposal, that syntax was brought up by Tab Atkins. >> >> It's already available. I was looking into how to handle <img [no >> source] style="background: url(..)" /> >> It may work with the following, now, or at some point in the future: >> <img style="content: replaced; background-color: ...;" /> >> >> I'd proposed visibility: content-hidden; to be used with background >> and border. > > Why should we use inline-styles once again? Why should we load content > images with CSS? What about accessibility? Where to add alt-attribute > / title / ARIA etc.? > They're CSS styles, I'm using inline for demonstrative purposes. I'd load images because the CSS <image> spec is more powerful than the HTML image spec, offering things like -webkit-canvas (soon -element), various background sizing and fitting routines. Accessibility is maintained exactly as it was, you'd put the alt attribute in the image tag.
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 15:49:04 UTC