- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:40:52 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:00:57 +0200, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > (11/10/21 17:14), Rune Lillesveen wrote: >> First, it's in a non-normative section, and we want UAs to move >> towards an @viewport implementation. That being said, it's there to >> suggest a mapping between viewport meta and @viewport in a transition >> phase. > > Can we make this conditionally normative instead, like "UAs supporting > meta-viewport must map content attribute of...."? I don't think browses > will drop the support for meta-viewport anyway, and having something > interoperable here seems desirable. I don't think conditionally normative is going to be a stronger incentive to get interoperability than an informative description in this case. > Or does this look like something that should go into the HTML spec? If it was going to be normative - possibly. > As a side comment, I don't the UA stylesheet subsection belongs here. It > should probably goes into the appendix. I've added a separate UA stylesheet section to the ED published today. -- Rune Lillesveen Layout Group Manager Core Technology Department Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 16:41:14 UTC