- From: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:03:55 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- CC: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:27 AM > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > I like this much better. This way positive and negative flex will never mix in one > result, and you achieve the goal of min-width to limit the final outcome, not > distribution. > > Glad you're happy about it! > Why is min-width the limiting factor here and not max(min-width, minimum-preferred-width) ? In such cases the flex is already overconstrained causing an overflow, so why not respect the minimum size of the content? Rossen
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 00:04:28 UTC