- From: Fred . <eldmannen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:48:32 +0000
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Thanks for your reply, yes I've posted to that mailing list. I am aware of -moz-appearance and -webkit-appearence and tried it with Firefox 6.0.2 and Chrome 14. It seems only 'button' value is supported. :( On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > Hi Fred, > > Most of the CSS3 UI properties are actually fairly well implemented. > > The 'appearance' property in particular has shown to be problematic. > > While there are separate -webkit-appearance and -moz-webkit appearance > properties, it's not clear how much they interoperate nor how similar > they are to the currently defined 'appearance' property. > > Hence I've moved the 'appearance' property to be "at risk" in the > editor's draft. > > If you don't mind, please to post additional feedback / comments / > critique of CSS3-UI (and any CSS draft) on the www-style mailing list: > > www-style@w3.org > > so that we can publicly archive your comments and feedback and the follow-up. > > Feel free to CC me as well. > > Thanks! > > Tantek > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:21, Fred . <eldmannen@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why is support for CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 so poorly >> implemented? >> >> It seems no browser supports 'appearance', not even in the latest >> versions except for 'button'. >> > > > > -- > http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5 >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 11:59:50 UTC