On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2011/10/12-css-irc#T16-47-22 > > "RESOLVED: accept TabAtkins and fantasai's proposal such that inherit turns > the specified value into the parent's computed value" > > I just realized that this doesn't necessarily make any sense for shorthand > properties. In fact, most of chapter 6 seems to operate under an unstated > assumption that each declaration setting a shorthand has been converted to > equivalent declarations for the corresponding longhand properties. Do you mean because it's possible that the computed values of the longhand properties end up not forming a valid value for the shorthand when combined? Or just that shorthands don't really have computed values, and are just mechanisms to pipe values into the longhand properties? > There is a sentence about how declaring a shorthand to be !important is > equivalent to declaring all of its sub-properties to be !important. Probably > there should be similar wording for 'inherit'. That sounds reasonable. Anyone else have thoughts on this? ~TJReceived on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:27:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:05 UTC