- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:14:54 +0900
- To: "John Daggett" <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style@w3.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:08:22 +0900, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: >> We have a similar wiki page for CSSOM that people can use to register >> new constants: >> >> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/cssom-constants >> >> Nobody has done so yet it seems. > > This is better than nothing but I had no idea this existed. How about a > note in the spec pointing to this page? And we should probably add in > the constants defined in various specs already (e.g. the constants in > CSS3 Animation). I should do that. > The current spec has this: > >> Vendors are encouraged to use reasonably unique values outside this >> range so that they do not clash with extensions from other vendors. >> For example, the first value for Mozilla could be 0x08EC0001 and >> 0x09E8A001 could be the first for Opera. > > Where the heck do those numbers come from?!? Ian made them up. The first can be read as GECKO001, the other as OPERA001 ;-) > Wouldn't it make more sense to have a registry of vendor-specific > constants on the wiki page? > > -o- 1000 > -ms- 2000 > -moz- 3000 > -webkit- 4000 I don't think it matters much. Better to just standardize early on. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 01:15:43 UTC