after the fixes, point 4 doesn't look confusing anymore :) cheers! On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:43 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote: > On 10/08/2011 12:56 PM, shi chuan wrote: > >> Here is a list of things I spotted while reading the draft, they might be >> issues: >> >> 1. Under selectors overview section, E:current(sdoesn't have a closing >> tag, shouldn't it be E:current(s)? >> >> >> 2. There isn't detailed description for E:current(s >> >> 3. E:nth-match(n ofselector <http://www.w3.org/TR/**selectors4/#selector<http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/#selector>>)repeated >> twice under selectors overview section >> >> 4. under *13.3. ‘:nth-last-column()’ pseudo-class*, the description starts >> with:nth-column(an+b), shouldn't it be >> :nth-last-column(an+b) ? >> > > Ok, I've fixed these in the editor's draft: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/**selectors4/<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/> > > > And the whole paragraph sounds a bit confusing, >> > > Hm, could you be a little more specific? :) Or give me some suggestions for > rewording. > > ~fantasai > > -- *Shi Chuan **Web Developer* Twitter: @shichuan | Skype: shichuanr shichuanr@gmail.com | www.blog.highub.comReceived on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 00:24:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:05 UTC