- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:11:15 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:19:24 +0100, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: >> It would also mean >> that floaters that extend beyond the boundaries of the spanning >> element will affect the following spanning element's content... > > This is true... but that's the case with consecutive headings that > contain a float in the normal block formatting model anyhow. Also, should that not be the desired behavior, it can be turned off using overflow:hidden. I am not sure it could be manually turned on if we chose proposition B instead. >> Advocating for this option means to only consider the case when the >> column spanning element is an immediate child of multi-column element >> which is a restriction that is not imposed by the current spec (nor >> should it be). > > Such an unrestricted model doesn't make much sense to me anyway. Surely > only elements which participate in the block formatting context of one > of the columns should be allowed to span. What are the use cases for > allowing spanning from within a nested BFC? What does it mean for an > element inside an inline-block or overflow-scroll or floated or abspos > column content element to span the columns? I haven't thought about this as deeply as I probably should, but my first reaction is that I would have no problem banning spanning on elements that don't participate in the BFC of one of the columns. - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 12:11:49 UTC