- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:36:35 -0500
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 01:37:03 UTC
Yes, that's what I meant. I don't know if that is what was intended or not. I rather thought not since the phrase dynamic updates was used. If that were the case, what would not be a dynamic update? -brian On Nov 28, 2011 7:45 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/28/11 7:40 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > >> Also .... David mentioned that the hard part of :has would be during >> updates....it seems to me the inverse is true and that the initial pass >> is considerably more difficult to optimize. There are lots of tricks to >> optimize the performance of updates for the vast majority of cases, but >> on the initial draw its possible that you don't know that a rule matches >> until much later. >> > > I'm not sure why not. Do you mean because the page is not done being > parsed? If so, that's just a special case of dynamic updates, no? > > -Boris > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 01:37:03 UTC