- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:40:31 -0500
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 00:41:07 UTC
It seems the notion of :has as opposed to symbol based subject identifier keeps coming up in numerous contexts and by numerous people and that there appears to be at least agreement that many people prefer the way it reads. fantasai's historical arguments on the wiki considered, is it wishful thinking on my part that that is the case? Also .... David mentioned that the hard part of :has would be during updates....it seems to me the inverse is true and that the initial pass is considerably more difficult to optimize. There are lots of tricks to optimize the performance of updates for the vast majority of cases, but on the initial draw its possible that you don't know that a rule matches until much later. Can anyone comment? Brian
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 00:41:07 UTC