W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [css3-lists] 'glyphs' descriptor poorly named

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:29:12 -0800
Message-ID: <4ED202E8.10603@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 11/24/2011 07:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:18 PM, John Daggett<jdaggett@mozilla.com>  wrote:
>> The @counter-style rule defined in CSS3 Lists specifies two descriptors,
>> 'glyphs' and 'additive-glyphs'.  I think these are both namely
>> inappropriately since the lists associated with these descriptors are
>> lists of *characters*, not of glyphs.
>> These are really lists of characters used for markers so I would instead
>> suggest 'markers' and 'additive-markers' instead.
>> I would like this marked as an issue in the current draft.
> Hmm.  I agree that "glyphs" isn't an ideal name here, but I don't
> think "markers" is either, given that they're used to *construct*
> markers.  Maybe "symbols"?

Works for me.

Received on Sunday, 27 November 2011 09:29:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:07 UTC