Re: [css3-animations] scope of keyframes and OM issues from Daniel Glazman on 2011-11-25 (www-style@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:43:56 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <4ECF473C.30303@disruptive-innovations.com>

Le 25/11/11 04:32, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :

> Yes, this sort of thing would be useful.  I had something similar
> proposed for the old @var form of rules, for the same reason.  I think
> we should see about minting a "namespace" object for CSS functions
> like this, so we can use nice short names like
> "document.CSS.keyframes".  (This would also help with things like the
> Values OM, so we can have nice short constructors instead of the
> horrible long names currently in the draft. ^_^)

Fine by me.

</Daniel>

Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 07:44:35 UTC