- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:18:46 -0800
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:
> Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.:
>
> > > @counter-style lower-norwegian {
> > > type: alphabetic;
> > > glyphs: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z æ ø å;
> > > }
> >
> > Then you can't distinguish an <image> from a glyph that just happens
> > to look remarkably like url(foo).
>
> We could just say that they can't be combined. The use cases seem
> slim, and the amount of work to get interoperable implementations
> (e.g., getting SVGs to interoperably co-exist, size-wise and
> position-wise, with glyphs) seems high.
Actually, that should be trivial. Both of those are well-defined.
That said, I agree that there's not much use in combining them.
> Then we could do:
>
> @counter-style lower-norwegian-glyphs {
> alphabetic: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z æ ø å;
> }
>
> @counter-style lower-norwegian-images {
> images: url(a.svg) url(b.svg) url(c.svg); /* etc */
> }
That seems fine, with the caveat in your next post about escaping
spaces. I'd forgotten you can do that!
~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 01:19:35 UTC