On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.: > > > > @counter-style lower-norwegian { > > > type: alphabetic; > > > glyphs: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z æ ø å; > > > } > > > > Then you can't distinguish an <image> from a glyph that just happens > > to look remarkably like url(foo). > > We could just say that they can't be combined. The use cases seem > slim, and the amount of work to get interoperable implementations > (e.g., getting SVGs to interoperably co-exist, size-wise and > position-wise, with glyphs) seems high. Actually, that should be trivial. Both of those are well-defined. That said, I agree that there's not much use in combining them. > Then we could do: > > @counter-style lower-norwegian-glyphs { > alphabetic: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z æ ø å; > } > > @counter-style lower-norwegian-images { > images: url(a.svg) url(b.svg) url(c.svg); /* etc */ > } That seems fine, with the caveat in your next post about escaping spaces. I'd forgotten you can do that! ~TJReceived on Thursday, 24 November 2011 01:19:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:06 UTC