- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:54:37 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/23/2011 03:05 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:28:19 +0100, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> That's mainly my fault for not reviewing the Gradients portion >> of the draft earlier. Generally-speaking, if I haven't reviewed >> a draft in depth, when I get around to it, there are going to >> be Comments. So shoot me. [1] > > Well, I don't blame you for reviewing gradients in a phase that is > officially appropriate for reviewing gradients. I am just thinking > that if we had a rule saying that syntax review is supposed to be > at an earlier phase, you might have done so earlier, and that this > would probably be a good thing. And if I had come up with a Suboptimal Design Flaw, you would say there should be a rule that Suboptimal Design Flaw reviews should be done at an earlier phase. :) You'd really want a Review Everything Sooner Faster rule. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 23:55:08 UTC