W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Unprefixing CSS properties

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:54:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4ECD87BD.5070603@inkedblade.net>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/23/2011 03:05 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:28:19 +0100, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> That's mainly my fault for not reviewing the Gradients portion
>> of the draft earlier. Generally-speaking, if I haven't reviewed
>> a draft in depth, when I get around to it, there are going to
>> be Comments. So shoot me. [1]
> Well, I don't blame you for reviewing gradients in a phase that is
> officially appropriate for reviewing gradients. I am just thinking
> that if we had a rule saying that syntax review is supposed to be
> at an earlier phase, you might have done so earlier, and that this
> would probably be a good thing.

And if I had come up with a Suboptimal Design Flaw, you would say
there should be a rule that Suboptimal Design Flaw reviews should
be done at an earlier phase. :) You'd really want a Review Everything
Sooner Faster rule.

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 23:55:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:07 UTC