- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:37:10 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday 2011-11-23 17:47 +0100, Florian Rivoal wrote: > So I propose that we remove section 8 (or at least the first sentence) and > either: > > * add a note that clarifies things along the line of what you > just explained > > * change section 7 so that nothing ends up being a replaced element, > and add some mechanism similar to what Tab proposed to make > anything become a replaced element. My preference is the first option. We could also replace this sentence in section 8 (Replaced content): # If the computed value of the part of the ‘content’ property that # ends up being used is a single URI, then the element or # pseudo-element is a replaced element. with: # If the part of the ‘content’ property that ends up being used # precedes a comma (i.e., it has additional fallback after it), # then the element or pseudo-element is a replaced element. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:38:04 UTC