- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:30:10 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/23/11 6:41 AM, "Florian Rivoal" <florianr@opera.com> wrote: >>>> * text-justify >>> >>> I'd push this back. [...] >> >> I don't know of any open issues on this property, other than the request >> for more examples, as I addressed all other the feedback that was brought >> forward. If you have more issues, you'll have to raise them. > > I don't have specific problems with details of the proposal, but rather a > general opinion about it. I am just not sure this is the right approach. > The > previous proposal (discussed at Kyoto), was too specific about a few > things, > such that it would disallow good justification algorithms (such as TeX's). > Now that's fixed, but the result seems fairly fuzzy to me, and I am not > sure > we can expect much interoperability out of it. How would you write text > cases > for this? How much interoperability are you looking for? Different justification algorithms will always result in different line breaks and spacing values used. But I think we can have tests that check that text-justify:inter-word only changes word spacing and leaves inter-character spacing alone. Alan
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 15:31:34 UTC