- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:27:36 -0800
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 01:28:07 UTC
On 22/11/11 11:58, Brian Manthos wrote: > _http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-box-shadow_ > # <shadow> = inset? && [ <length>{2,4} && <color>? ] > _http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#text-shadow_ > # Computed value: a color plus three absolute <length>s > So the 4^th length is omitted from the computed value of text-shadow? I think it has been mentioned previously in the list that text-shadow was spec'ed before spread radius was added in box-shadow. Thus, the text-shadow definition assumes 3 lengths, even though it doesn't explicitly restrict text-shadow to 3 lengths. So, technically, a spread radius should be allowed but the way it should work is not specified anywhere (there was a recent discussion about spread radius in text-shadow: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0796.html ). The only UA currently implementing a spread radius in text-shadow is Trident. My point is that the issue you are pointing out with the text-shadow definition is actually part of a much bigger one. -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 01:28:07 UTC