- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:39:57 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/17/11 12:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> If we were being dogmatic and silly about it, sure. In practice, >> features can still be grouped somewhat. > > Why? Why delay releasing feature A once it's ready? That assumes it's > ready, of course. Recognizing when a feature is ready takes more than zero time, and other features can become ready before anyone notices the first. Delaying by a month or two while another feature that's *nearly* ready finishes stabilizing reduces the bureaucracy involved. (I said that punting to the next level isn't as hard as people are implying, not that it's zero-cost.) ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 00:46:12 UTC