Re: Unprefixing CSS properties

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Brian Manthos <>wrote:

> IMO, that's an argument for saying there is a more advanced stage than WD
> that includes "grammar is stable, only edge cases of behavior remain".  Is
> that stage CR?  If yes, then the current system supports your suggestion.
>  If that stage is not CR, perhaps something in between WD and CR should be
> considered -- and should be considered "unprefixable".

My proposal is essentially the latter: an "unprefixable" stage between WD
and CR, which can be applied to individual properties in a spec, plus a
proposal to move a particular set of properties to that stage immediately.
Please reconsider it in that light :-).

"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us
our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not
sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 20:18:35 UTC