- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:36:27 -0800
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > The "radial-gradient() Syntax" section currently says that <position> "is > defined as the positioning syntax of 'background-position'". > > This is unclear. Why not say that it is equivalent to <bg-position> as > defined in css3-backgrounds? Because the ED of B&B now uses the more generic term <position>. We'll push that to the CR draft at some point, since it's purely editorial. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 15:37:19 UTC