- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:15:24 -0800
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote that we just keep the aliases. I anticipate that most people who use the keywords will alternate between 'cover' and 'contain'. But those who do want to use farthest/nearest-side/corner would probably prefer them to be all consistently named. The computed value would just be 'farthest/nearest-side/corner', which could be a problem for round-tripping, but still seems like a reasonable trade-off. Given the way the syntax discussion turned out, I agree. Fantasai's example usage "radial-gradient(from 25px 25px to cover, blue, transparent)" works just fine if we keep the current definition of "cover", since the "as" clause defaults to center when omitted. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 17:16:21 UTC